.webp "media-law-delhi-high-court")
In a recent ruling, a Delhi Court emphasized the importance of maintaining ethical standards in journalism, particularly when it comes to defamatory content. The court stressed that the press should exercise caution and avoid publishing anything that is clearly defamatory towards individuals or institutions, unless the information has been duly verified and there are valid reasons to believe its truthfulness. Moreover, the publication should serve the public good.
The court highlighted that there is a recognized universal understanding among journalists about the need to refrain from defamatory writing. It noted that truth alone cannot be used as a defense for publishing derogatory or scandalous material about a private citizen, especially when it lacks any public interest.
While acknowledging that the press has the right to expose corruption and irregularities in public bodies as part of their responsibility to the public, the court stressed the importance of ensuring such reporting is backed by solid evidence. It emphasized that any allegations should be thoroughly investigated and verified from reliable sources. Additionally, it is crucial to provide the opportunity for the person or authority being criticized to present their side of the story.
The court's ruling came in response to a case filed by Atma Ram, a former Superintendent Engineer of Delhi Development Authority, against the editor of a newspaper called "Tahirpur Times." Ram alleged that the newspaper published false accusations, claiming he had acquired agricultural land through bribes. The court found the publication to be highly defamatory and ruled in favor of Ram, awarding him damages.
The court emphasized that every individual has the right to protect their reputation, and in cases where wrongful publications cause harm, legal remedies are available. It stated that defamation actions can be pursued, allowing individuals to seek compensation or take legal action against media entities involved in defamatory practices.
The court's decision underscored the court's stance on the matter, stressing that the language used in the article against Ram clearly portrayed defamatory imputations. The article falsely labeled him as a corrupt individual who had acquired multiple properties through illicit means.
Read the full order of the court - Order